Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

The Supreme Court upheld a state restriction on the free exercise of religion in its ruling Employment Division v.Smith.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Give examples of two interest groups that are frequently involved in civil liberties controversies,and give specific examples of issues on which they might participate.

Correct Answer

Answered by ExamLex AI

Answered by ExamLex AI

Two interest groups that are frequently ...

View Answer

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." This famous phrase comes from which of the following?


A) Declaration of Independence
B) First Amendment
C) Fourteenth Amendment
D) Eighteenth Amendment
E) Preamble

F) None of the above
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

If you read the entire Constitution and its amendments you will not find the word "privacy." Yet the Supreme Court has ruled that Americans have a constitutional right to privacy.From where does this right come? What case law can you cite where the Court has discussed this right to privacy? Do you agree with the Court on this issue?

Correct Answer

Answered by ExamLex AI

Answered by ExamLex AI

The right to privacy is not explicitly m...

View Answer

Why is the Miranda warning sometimes called the "poor person's Fifth Amendment"?


A) The Fifth Amendment does not apply to poor citizens.
B) Without the Miranda warning,poor citizens would not be protected by the Fifth Amendment.
C) It is assumed that the warning is less critical for those who are wealthier and better educated.
D) Without the warning,the Double Jeopardy Clause would not apply.
E) Prior to the Miranda warning,there was no legal protection now provided by the warning.

F) D) and E)
G) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Roe v.Wade dealt with which of the following issues?


A) Prior restraint
B) Exclusionary rule
C) Abortion
D) Right to a fair trial
E) Reserved powers

F) B) and E)
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

After stopping someone for a routine traffic violation,police officers search the trunk of the car and discover illegal drugs.The defendant's lawyer claims that the police search was illegal and the evidence cannot be used based on


A) the Privileges and Immunities Clause.
B) the Bad Tendency Doctrine.
C) the Exclusionary Rule.
D) prior restraint.
E) original intent.

F) B) and E)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

When the Bill of Rights was initially added to the Constitution,it applied to which of the following levels of government?


A) National government only
B) State governments only
C) State and local governments only
D) All levels of government
E) Local government only

F) B) and D)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The Bill of Rights is the foundation of civil liberties policymaking in America.Write an essay tracing the history of the Bill of Rights.Your essay should deal with the following questions: a)What is the Bill of Rights? b)To which level of government did the Bill of Rights initially apply? c)What is selective incorporation? d)On what constitutional provision is selective incorporation based? e)What is the constitutional status of the Bill of Rights today?

Correct Answer

Answered by ExamLex AI

Answered by ExamLex AI

The Bill of Rights is the first ten amen...

View Answer

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S.Constitution protects against which of the following?


A) Unreasonable search and seizure
B) Cruel and unusual punishment
C) Double jeopardy
D) Self-incrimination
E) None of the above

F) C) and D)
G) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is


A) Hates crimes legislation makes it illegal for an individual to express hatred or intolerance toward someone on account of race,religion,national origin,gender,or sexual orientation.
B) Hate crimes laws increase penalties for persons convicted of criminal offenses motivated by prejudice based on race,religion,national origin,gender,or sexual orientation.
C) The Supreme Court has ruled that hate crimes laws are unconstitutional because they abridge freedom of expression.
D) Hate crimes occur only in large cities.
E) Constitutionally,hate crimes legislation can be enacted only at the state level.

F) B) and D)
G) A) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

B

According to the Supreme Court,which of the following forms of expression is protected by the Constitution?


A) Libel
B) Slander
C) Obscenity
D) Burning the flag of the United States
E) Pornography

F) A) and B)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The Supreme Court recently ruled that hate crimes legislation is unconstitutional because it punishes people for their political views.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

False

In Gideon v.Wainwright,the Supreme Court ruled that states must provide attorneys for individuals charged with crimes who are financially unable to afford a lawyer.The Court based its ruling on the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments.Suppose a state decided to provide attorneys to indigent defendants only for cases when the punishment could exceed a year in prison.Otherwise,poor defendants must defend themselves.Would the state's policy be constitutionally permissible?


A) Yes,because states may grant their citizens fewer rights than those incorporated through the Fourteenth Amendment against the states.
B) Yes,because the Constitution permits states considerable leeway to interpret the rulings of the Supreme Court.
C) No,because the state's policy would violate the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments as interpreted by the Supreme Court in the case of Gideon v.Wainwright.
D) No,because the state's policy would contradict the Supreme Court's decision in Marbury v.Madison.
E) No,because the state's policy would contradict the Supreme Court's decision in Barron v.Baltimore.

F) A) and E)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Give an example of a right that the Supreme Court considers a fundamental right.Under what circumstances may the government restrict fundamental rights?

Correct Answer

Answered by ExamLex AI

Answered by ExamLex AI

One example of a fundamental right that ...

View Answer

All of the rights guaranteed under U.S.law are considered fundamental.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The Supreme Court has never held that the right to drive an automobile is a fundamental right.May government restrict an individual's right to drive a car?


A) No.The Constitution protects the right to own and use property.
B) Yes,if government can show that a restriction fulfills a legitimate public purpose.
C) Yes,but only if government can demonstrate a compelling public interest to restrict an individual's right to drive a car.
D) State governments can restrict the right to drive an automobile,but the national government cannot.
E) No.The Twenty-sixth Amendment specifically addresses the right to drive a car.

F) B) and D)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The California Supreme Court has ruled that the state constitution requires the state to provide free abortion services for women receiving Medicaid benefits.What is the legal status of the California state court's ruling?


A) It is unconstitutional because the U.S.Supreme Court has never held that government must provide free abortion services to Medicaid recipients.
B) It is unconstitutional because states may not provide their residents broader rights than those provided by the U.S.Constitution.
C) It is unconstitutional because the Bill of Rights does not mention abortion.
D) It is constitutional because states may grant their residents broader rights than guaranteed by the national Constitution.
E) It is unconstitutional because the Bill of Rights was never approved by the states.

F) A) and D)
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

D

The case of Gregg v.Georgia dealt with which of the following issues?


A) Freedom of expression
B) The exclusionary rule
C) Double jeopardy
D) Capital punishment
E) Flag burning

F) A) and E)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A city council passes an ordinance local law prohibiting employment discrimination against gay men and lesbians.Would this ordinance be constitutional?


A) Yes,because states and localities may grant their residents greater rights protection than provided in the national constitution.
B) No,because the Constitution says nothing about gay and lesbian rights.
C) No,because the Supreme Court has not interpreted the Constitution to grant protection against employment discrimination to gay men and lesbians.
D) No,because the Supreme Court would interpret this ordinance to be discriminatory against employers.
E) No,because the Supreme Court is not permitted to rule on this area of law.

F) A) and D)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 1 - 20 of 51

Related Exams

Show Answer