Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

Seventeen-year-old Teresa wants to disaffirm her student loan agreements. In most states, she will not be allowed to do so.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

To avoid a contract, an intoxicated person must have been so intoxicated as to be unable to understand the consequences of his actions or unable to act in a reasonable manner.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In a contract to sell necessaries to a minor, these goods and services are limited to medical care, food, and shelter.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is least likely to be classified as a necessary item for which a minor will be held liable on a contract?


A) A camera.
B) School supplies.
C) Clothing.
D) An automobile.

E) A) and D)
F) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In which of the following situations would a minor be unable to disaffirm a contract which he had made?


A) Upon restoring the consideration received in a situation involving a fully executed contract.
B) Where real property is involved, upon reaching the age of majority.
C) During the time of his minority or for a reasonable time thereafter.
D) Where the minor wishes to perform part of a contract and disaffirm another part of the same contract.

E) A) and B)
F) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Fourteen-year-old Marsha bought $120 worth of video games at a local store, using her own money. Her parents insisted that she return the items and get her money back. Which of the following is true?


A) If there is a conflict, the store's return policy will override Marsha's right of disaffirmation.
B) In most jurisdictions, Marsha may get her money back only if she has not opened or damaged the merchandise in any way.
C) In a majority of jurisdictions, Marsha may get her money back even if she cannot return the merchandise.
D) In most jurisdictions, Marsha may get some of her money back but she must pay the reasonable value of the goods if that differs from the contract price.

E) A) and C)
F) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is untrue regarding the contracts of intoxicated persons?


A) If an intoxicated person is unable to understand the nature and consequences of his act, then the contract is voidable.
B) The effect of intoxication is generally the same as that given to contracts that are voidable because of incompetency.
C) Slight intoxication will destroy one's contractual capacity.
D) To make a contract voidable, a person need not be so drunk that he is totally without reason or understanding.

E) A) and C)
F) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

If a minor sells property that the buyer then resells to a good faith purchaser for value and the minor then disaffirms the sales contract, under both the traditional view and the UCC, the minor can recover the property from the good faith purchaser for value since the minor has the power of avoidance and both purchasers had only voidable title.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Donald, a minor, makes a contract with Albert, an adult, to buy a motorcycle. One week later, Donald has his eighteenth birthday and shortly thereafter tells Albert he will pick up the motorcycle next week. In this case:


A) Donald has expressly ratified the contract.
B) the contract must be renegotiated, because Donald was a minor when it was made.
C) Donald can change his mind and avoid the contract, because it was made when he was a minor.
D) the contract is void ab initio , because Donald was a minor at the time it was made.

E) A) and B)
F) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Compare the liability of an intoxicated person to that of a person who is mentally ill. How are their situations similar? How are they different with regard to contractual capacity?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

If a person is mentally incompetent, he ...

View Answer

Robert Briscoe is 17 years old. He lies to Bouyers Auto about his age in order to induce them to sell him a new pickup truck. Bouyers falls for this lie and sells him the pickup. Under the prevailing view, Robert:


A) may disaffirm and get his money back.
B) may not disaffirm since he lied.
C) may only receive a portion of his money.
D) will receive his money less depreciation.

E) None of the above
F) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The case of In re The Score Board, Inc. involved the issue of:


A) a minor's liability for misrepresentation of age.
B) whether an incompetent person's contracts are void or voidable.
C) ratification of a contract upon attaining majority.
D) liability for necessaries.

E) C) and D)
F) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Ratification does need to be express; it may be implied from the minor's conduct.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Natalie, age 17, rented a power washer and while using the machine, she negligently damaged it beyond repair. Under the majority view, the rental company can successfully sue Natalie for damages on a tort theory of negligence since it is well settled that minors are liable for their torts.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 61 - 74 of 74

Related Exams

Show Answer